The part about the arch of Constantine really is pretty odd.
If you read the wiki on Constantine it becomes clear that the versions of his life's story all disappear after his reign. All but the one Eusebius of Caesarea fictionalised. There are whole books on early church suppression of non Christian history.
Is it not odd that no Mithras traditions survived antiquity. They were a secretive cult, but not a single document from the educated roman elite or references from Seneca? Just saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment